Minutes of 13 Oct Sept 2006 SWMD Telephone Meeting
"Present": Andre Sopczak, George Ellwood, Justin Greenhalgh,
Luis Fernandez, Frank Jackson, Nigel Watson
Brief reports on:
- Collimator designs and manufacturing
Q: What do we want to use next beam time for? What aspect of
design or calculation are we trying to test?
- wire
eroded collimators
George summarised status of manufacturing study using electrical
discharge machining process of new collimators (by outside manufacturing
company), where "hollowed out" versions of two taper collimator
8 from 2006 ESA run had been produced. Versions had been made in
OFE copper and Ti-alloy. Small bowing of the longest surface - which
would be screwed to the wakefield box sandwich - had been seen
after the central portion of the collimator had been removed. This
could probably have been avoided by heat treating prior to
manufacture. It may be adequate for the ESA tests as the
distortion may be reduced during installation at SLAC.
Characterisation of surface quality of one and two passes of EDM
were compared, approx. 30% improvement in average roughness (Ra) gained
by second pass. [Ra is the average (absolute value) deviation from
the mean; Rmax is the sum of the absolute values of the most
positive deviation above mean with corresponding most negative
deviation in a particular sampling length; and Rz is the average
Rmax over several sampling lengths (one evaluation length),
therefore always less than Rmax].
Quality
significantly less good than that obtained for 2006 collimators, but Ra thought to be acceptable for 2007
SLAC tests, as impact would be relative to vertical beam size at
ESA (~100microns). NKW to discuss results at next ESA phone
meeting (NKW version of George's slides for 16-Oct-2006 ESA meeting).
- Coupled
field analysis, and movie files for talk: vM
stress and stress
in y direction
George had returned to coupled field analysis within ANSYS, using
2D slice (longitudinal section) of a tapered collimator.
Extending earlier study to use real FLUKA energy deposition from
Ti-alloy + graphite spoiler from Luis. Maximum stress observed in
the region where reflected stress wave meets heated zone (beam
trajectory)... To be continued using alternative energy
depositions from Ti-alloy/hollow structures.
- T-480 Data analysis et al
- Luis plots
Luis studied alterntive method of assigning resolutions to
individual BPMs by using 9 BPMs to determine a reference value
against which the measurement of the remaining BPM could be
compared. This can be used for reference runs only and values for
resolution are obtained which are comparable to those obtained
using information within a doublet or triplet along, from which
a single resolution is determined and attributed to all members of
a given doublet/triplet.
Will continue with this method and produce results for deflections
for all runs, to summarise results in spreadsheet.
- NKW had briefly looked into use of MINUIT for fitting within
Matlab, to cross-check results obtained using "noplot_polyfit.m".
This is in context of trying to reformulate fits which directly extract
deflection per pulse from modified paramatrisation.
- Wire Tests
Luis and Carl had been in the RF lab., wire stretched in reference
vessel, some tests with old TDR equipment but resolution obtained
not too promising, also some difficulty obtaining data for offline
analysis due to lack of GPI card. Agreed to investigate using
the faster network analyser recently obtained in RF lab..
- Wakefield Simulations (update from Jonny)
New version of moving mesh GdfidL
(12-Oct): corrects for bug when charge was traveling on a magnetic
wall and napoly integration was needed (ie a scraper/collimator).
The transverse wakepotential calculated was incorrect, often showing
a large offset.
- Merlin Simulations - Rectangular vs. circular apertures
Adriana and Roger had been following up using both higher order
mode wakefields in whole ILC BDS using circular apertures, and
using lower order modes only but with geometryfor wakefields
that matches physical apertures. More news soon.
Query to Frank about how critical the z location of the
collimator material is, in context of distributing the material
together with a shallow taper - not thought to be a critical
problem.
- Review timescales on critical path
- Lead time to manufacture collimators by EDM ~3 weeks
- "Physicist" designs by 13 Nov., latest
- Drawings generated/approved at RAL, 17 Nov
- Fabrication start, 20 Nov
- Ship to SLAC by early Jan for installation and run start end Jan.
- Next meeting: Wed. 25 Oct. 1530 - 1700 (UK)
NKW After meeting notes:
- EDM OK for ESA tests, what would be suitable for final ILC
beam with sigma_y ~ 10microns?
- Hollowed out collimators: if needed single taper angle of
~20mrad, 0.6rad. length of Ti6Al4V = 2.1cm, thickness of taper
material would be 0.4mm...